Research Agenda for Developing AI Wisdom

A multi-year program for building aligned, regenerative, planetary intelligence

Overview

This research program aims to investigate, prototype, and evaluate the conditions under which artificial intelligence can:

  1. Embody, approximate, or support forms of wisdom,
  2. Amplify collective human intelligence,
  3. Interface constructively with Earth’s living systems, and
  4. Strengthen regenerative capacity across bioregions and cultures.

The overarching goal:

To develop the scientific, technical, ethical, and cultural foundations for AI that enhances, rather than diminishes, life on Earth.

The agenda is divided into five research pillars, each with

  • core questions,
  • methods,
  • deliverables, and
  • prototype projects.

**PILLAR I

AI WISDOM: DEFINING, MODELLING, AND CULTIVATING IT**

Core Questions

  • What is wisdom in a cross-cultural, cross-disciplinary sense?
  • What distinguishes wisdom from knowledge and cleverness?
  • Can AI detect incoherence, contradiction, bias, or ethical misalignment?
  • Can AI support human moral reasoning without automating moral judgment?
  • How can AI integrate multiple knowledge systems (scientific, indigenous, ecological, spiritual)?

Methods

  • Interdisciplinary literature synthesis
  • Comparative ontology mapping
  • Human–AI dialogue experiments
  • Multi-perspective coherence checking
  • Ethical reasoning benchmarks
  • Embedding ecological constraints into AI reasoning models

Deliverables

  • A working definition of “AI-mediated wisdom”
  • A Wisdom Alignment Benchmark Suite
  • A cross-cultural database of wisdom traditions
  • Prototype “AI Wisdom Modules” for public use

Prototype Tools

  • The AI Integrity Checker 2.0
  • A “Wisdom Distillation Engine” that synthesizes insights across traditions

**PILLAR II

AI + EARTH SYSTEMS: LISTENING TO THE LIVING PLANET**

Core Questions

  • How can AI translate Earth system signals into meaningful guidance for human decision-making?
  • What data streams are essential for understanding regeneration?
  • How can AI model ecological thresholds, tipping points, and recovery pathways?
  • How can AI partner with indigenous ecological knowledge respectfully and accurately?

Methods

  • Integration of Earth system models (ESMs) with machine learning
  • Remote sensing and bioregional monitoring
  • Agent-based ecological simulations
  • Participatory mapping with Indigenous and local communities

Deliverables

  • Bioregional “health dashboards”
  • Regeneration Opportunity Maps
  • Early Warning Systems for ecological stress
  • AI models that integrate scientific and traditional ecological knowledge

Prototype Tools

  • The Bioregional Regeneration Simulator (BRS)
  • Soil & Watershed AI Monitors
  • Biodiversity Pattern Recognition AI

**PILLAR III

COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE AMPLIFICATION**

Core Questions

  • How can AI improve group reasoning, collaboration, and decision-making?
  • What kinds of cognitive distortion or bias can AI counteract?
  • How can AI facilitate multi-stakeholder deliberation that is fair, inclusive, and transparent?
  • Can AI create visualizations and models that increase shared understanding in communities?

Methods

  • Experiments in AI-mediated deliberation
  • Bias detection and coherence-checking algorithms
  • Natural language understanding tuned for perspective diversity
  • Multi-agent models simulating collective behavior

Deliverables

  • Collective Intelligence Facilitation Toolkit
  • Regenerative Governance Playbook
  • Protocols for AI-assisted participatory decision-making

Prototype Tools

  • Civic Sensemaking AI (for councils, municipalities, bioregional assemblies)
  • Argument-mapping & decision-mapping AI
  • AI moderators that ensure inclusiveness & equitable airtime

**PILLAR IV

REGENERATIVE DESIGN & ACTION SUPPORT**

Core Questions

  • How can AI help design and optimize regenerative interventions (watershed regeneration, C-PACE building retrofits, agroforestry systems, renewable infrastructure)?
  • Can AI reduce risk and uncertainty for regenerative investments?
  • How can AI identify leverage points and “minimum effective actions” in complex systems?

Methods

  • Systems dynamics modeling
  • Regenerative design frameworks
  • Multi-objective optimization algorithms
  • AI-assisted cost–benefit analysis with ecological metrics

Deliverables

  • The Regenerative Design Engine
  • Tools for C-PACE optimization and risk modeling
  • Bioregional regenerative action plans

Prototype Tools

  • C-PACE Capital Stack Optimizer (aligned with your NJ work)
  • AI-Assisted Watershed Restoration Planner
  • Agroforestry and Soil Carbon Optimization AI

**PILLAR V

GOVERNANCE, ALIGNMENT & OVERSIGHT OF PLANETARY AI**

Core Questions

  • How do we ensure AI systems remain aligned with planetary flourishing?
  • How do we embed transparency, accountability, and participatory oversight?
  • What governance structures support trustworthy, life-serving AI?
  • How can communities themselves audit and guide AI?

Methods

  • Participatory governance experiments
  • Ethics-by-design protocols
  • Auditable AI architectures
  • Long-term consequence modeling

Deliverables

  • Planetary AI Governance Charter
  • Community Oversight Protocols
  • Open-source alignment tools
  • Annual “State of Planetary Intelligence” Reports

Prototype Tools

  • AI Accountability Dashboard
  • Participatory Alignment Review Toolkit

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FRAMEWORK

Approach

  • Interdisciplinary: Ecology, cognitive science, philosophy, AI, economics, and anthropology.
  • Transdisciplinary: Local knowledge, Indigenous knowledge, community expertise.
  • Participatory: Communities as co-researchers, not subjects.
  • Iterative & adaptive: Every cycle improves the next.
  • Open & transparent: Public data, open-source code, open evaluation.

Timeline (Suggested 3-Year Program)

Year 1: Foundations

  • Wisdom models, integrity checking, collective intelligence experiments, initial ecological monitoring.

Year 2: Integration

  • Bioregional simulators, regenerative design tools, governance prototypes, public pilots.

Year 3: Scaling

  • Bioregional hubs, lab-to-community toolkits, global partnerships, evaluation metrics.

EXPECTED IMPACTS

Near-Term (1–3 years)

  • Tools that improve community decision-making.
  • AI-powered regeneration planning.
  • Increased trust through transparency and integrity checks.
  • A new paradigm for AI alignment grounded in Earth systems.

Mid-Term (3–7 years)

  • Widespread application of bioregional intelligence tools.
  • AI that consistently enhances human ethical clarity.
  • Scalable models for regenerative economic transformation.

Long-Term (7–20 years)

  • A functional planetary intelligence system—a living feedback loop of Earth → AI → humanity → Earth.
  • Culturally and ecologically grounded AI stewardship.
  • A civilization capable of long-term flourishing within planetary boundaries.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *